<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:gml="http://www.opengis.net/gml"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Chances A Short Sale Will Actually Sell</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.mytucsonblog.com/home-buying/the-chances-a-short-sale-will-actually-sell/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.mytucsonblog.com/home-buying/the-chances-a-short-sale-will-actually-sell/</link>
	<description>Everything you need to know about Tucson and Real Estate - and then some</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:05:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: John Lockwood</title>
		<link>http://www.mytucsonblog.com/home-buying/the-chances-a-short-sale-will-actually-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-1074</link>
		<dc:creator>John Lockwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 May 2008 21:39:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytucsonblog.com/?p=1014#comment-1074</guid>
		<description>I just got done writing a white paper and article Series on the Short Sale Fake Listing Fiasco.  (I&#039;ve linked to it above).

I believe the numbers may actually be lower than you&#039;ve listed here.  How do closed sale numbers compare to non-distressed sales, and how much lower than the non-distressed sales are these properties listed at?

In Sacramento County, 39% of active inventory are short sales, compared to 34% for non-distressed sales. Also, compared to non-distressed sales, short sale properties that did sell were discounted an average of 24% (about $81,000) from non-distressed sales. Yet of everything that closed in the last 30 days, 22% were non-distressed compared to only 8% for short sales. So even though short sales are discounted 24%, non-distressed sales outsell them more than 2 to 1.

So in my opinion, you can&#039;t just look at how many actually close -- you also have to keep in mind how many offers are actually written.  I&#039;m sure that lots and lots of buyers are out there failing on these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just got done writing a white paper and article Series on the Short Sale Fake Listing Fiasco.  (I&#8217;ve linked to it above).</p>
<p>I believe the numbers may actually be lower than you&#8217;ve listed here.  How do closed sale numbers compare to non-distressed sales, and how much lower than the non-distressed sales are these properties listed at?</p>
<p>In Sacramento County, 39% of active inventory are short sales, compared to 34% for non-distressed sales. Also, compared to non-distressed sales, short sale properties that did sell were discounted an average of 24% (about $81,000) from non-distressed sales. Yet of everything that closed in the last 30 days, 22% were non-distressed compared to only 8% for short sales. So even though short sales are discounted 24%, non-distressed sales outsell them more than 2 to 1.</p>
<p>So in my opinion, you can&#8217;t just look at how many actually close &#8212; you also have to keep in mind how many offers are actually written.  I&#8217;m sure that lots and lots of buyers are out there failing on these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kelley Koehler</title>
		<link>http://www.mytucsonblog.com/home-buying/the-chances-a-short-sale-will-actually-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-1052</link>
		<dc:creator>Kelley Koehler</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 15:30:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytucsonblog.com/?p=1014#comment-1052</guid>
		<description>Hi Anne!  Very true.  If we had better access to the MLS database, we could be much more exact.  As it is, I can&#039;t determine how many went contingent and didn&#039;t close without manually checking hundreds of listings.  And even then, I don&#039;t know if it fell out because of inspections, a buyer failing to qualify, or the bank not coming to terms with the seller.  I would call this a rough estimate.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Anne!  Very true.  If we had better access to the MLS database, we could be much more exact.  As it is, I can&#8217;t determine how many went contingent and didn&#8217;t close without manually checking hundreds of listings.  And even then, I don&#8217;t know if it fell out because of inspections, a buyer failing to qualify, or the bank not coming to terms with the seller.  I would call this a rough estimate.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anne</title>
		<link>http://www.mytucsonblog.com/home-buying/the-chances-a-short-sale-will-actually-sell/comment-page-1/#comment-1051</link>
		<dc:creator>Anne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 06 May 2008 12:51:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mytucsonblog.com/?p=1014#comment-1051</guid>
		<description>HI Kelly,

We should look at the ratios for the homes that went under offer that sold because that is the true indicator of  how many actually closed.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HI Kelly,</p>
<p>We should look at the ratios for the homes that went under offer that sold because that is the true indicator of  how many actually closed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
